While it has become quite clear that the last eukaryotic common ancestor
(LECA) was a bikont, i.e. had two anterior cilia to move around (as I wrote previously), it now seems that the LECA wasn't only a bikont, but also an
excavate. Excavates are one of the five main groups of eukaryotes (Adl et al.2012) having ancestrally two cilia and a ventral feeding groove. Excavates
include for example Trichomonas
(Parabasalia), Giardia (Fornicata),
Euglenozoa (e.g. Euglena, Trypanosoma), Heterolobosea, Jakobida (latter
three belonging to Discoba), and Malawimonas,
but it has turned out that they might not form a monophyletic group that seemed
quite likely in 2009 (Hampl et al. 2009). In my previous post I treated
excavates as monophyletic and avoided discussing them, although I was aware of
some problems. Particularly, Malawimonas,
which is structurally a typical excavate (possessing two cilia with a
characteristic ciliary apparatus and a ventral feeding groove; Simpson, 2003)
did not want to group very well with other excavates in phylogenomic analyses (Rodríguez-Ezpeletaet al. 2007; Derelle & Lang, 2012; Zhao et al. 2013; Brown et al. 2013). I
thought perhaps the data was incomplete to make a big deal about this. Now it
looks pretty clear (Cavalier-Smith et al. 2014; 2015; Derelle et al. 2015) that
Malawimonas is more closely related
to unikont/Opimoda branch (amoebae, animals, fungi and others; Fig. 1) than to (most) other excavates. Interestingly, phylogenomic analyses by Cavalier-Smith
et al. (2014; 2015) reveal that excavate groups Parabasalia, Fornicata, and
Preaxostyla might also be more closely related to unikonts than to Discoba (Euglenozoa,
Heterolobosoa, and Jakobida). Parabasalia, Fornicata, and Preaxostyla are
classified under Metamonada, who are all anaerobic or microaerophilic and lack
typical respiratory mitochondria. Many of them are parasites or symbionts of
animals. Unfortunately most of them are fast evolving, making it difficult to
place them in phylogenetic analyses, particularly Trichomonas and Giardia
for which full genomes are available. It would be necessary to obtain
additional genome scale data for more slowly evolving free-living species from groups like Dysnectes and Carpediemonas (Takishita et al. 2012) to place representatives of
Metamonada among eukaryotes more reliably.
 |
| Figure 1. Phylogeny of eukaryotes updated from my previous post mainly on the basis of Cavalier-Smith et al. (2014; 2015) and Derelle et al. (2015) papers. Although since 2010, Cavalier-Smith prefers to root the tree between Euglenozoa (member of Discoba) and other eukaryotes, the rooting found by Derelle et al. (2015) is more reliable, because it is based on large number of mitochondrial and other bacterial genes for which there are closer out-groups available than for genes of archaeal origin (see for example the rooting found by Lasek-Nesselquist& Gogarten, 2013 which fits Cavalier-Smith's scenario). Cavalier-Smith (2010; 2013) lists some genomic characters that appear to be ancestral (i.e. shared with prokaryotes) in Euglenozoa but derived in other eukaryotes. The problem is that full genome sequences are available only for few fast evolving and mostly parasitic Euglenozoa and other excavates, which makes these kinds of lists highly speculative. |
If the rooting of the eukoryote tree (Fig. 1) is correct, then it
really seems that the LECA might have been quite similar to a typical excavate like
Malawimonas or a jakobid (e.g. Jakoba, Reclinomonas, Andalucia).
This scenario finds support also from some alveolates (e.g. Colponema) that are structurally quite
similar to excavates (Tikhonenkov et al. 2014; Cavalier-Smith et al. 2014). Apparently,
Colponema, Acavomonas and many other similar undescribed groups (Janouškovecet al. 2013; Tikhonenkov et al. 2014) are phylogenetically diverse bunch that are
variously related to, but clearly outside of the three main groups of alveolates
(ciliates, apicomplexans, and dinoflagellates).
References
Adl SM,
Simpson AGB, Lane CE, Lukeš J, Bass D, Bowser SS, Brown MW, Burki F, Dunthorn
M, Hampl V, Heiss A, Hoppenrath M, Lara E, Gall L le, Lynn DH, McManus H,
Mitchell E a D, Mozley-Stanridge SE, Parfrey LW, Pawlowski J, Rueckert S,
Shadwick L, Schoch CL, Smirnov A, Spiegel FW (2012) The revised classification
of eukaryotes. The Journal of eukaryotic microbiology 59 (5): 429–514.
doi: 10.1111/j.1550-7408.2012.00644.x
Brown MW,
Sharpe SC, Silberman JD, Heiss AA, Lang BF, Simpson AGB, Roger AJ (2013)
Phylogenomics demonstrates that breviate flagellates are related to
opisthokonts and apusomonads. Proceedings. Biological sciences / The Royal
Society 280 (1769): 20131755. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2013.1755
Cavalier-Smith
T (2010) Kingdoms Protozoa and Chromista and the eozoan root of the eukaryotic
tree. Biology letters 6: 342–345. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2009.0948
Cavalier-Smith
T (2013) Early evolution of eukaryote feeding modes, cell structural diversity,
and classification of the protozoan phyla Loukozoa, Sulcozoa, and Choanozoa. European
journal of protistology 49 (2): 115–178. doi: 10.1016/j.ejop.2012.06.001
Cavalier-Smith T, Chao EE, Snell E
a, Berney C, Fiore-Donno AM, Lewis R (2014) Multigene eukaryote phylogeny
reveals the likely protozoan ancestors of opisthokonts (animals, fungi,
choanozoans) and Amoebozoa. Molecular phylogenetics and evolution 81: 71–85.
doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2014.08.012
Cavalier-Smith T, Chao EE, Lewis R
(2015) Multiple origins of Heliozoa from flagellate ancestors: New cryptist
subphylum Corbihelia, superclass Corbistoma, and monophyly of Haptista,
Cryptista, Hacrobia and Chromista. Molecular phylogenetics and evolution. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2015.07.004
Derelle R, Lang BF (2012) Rooting
the Eukaryotic Tree with Mitochondrial and Bacterial Proteins. Molecular
biology and evolution 29: 1277–1289. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msr295
Derelle R, Torruella G, Klimeš V,
Brinkmann H, Kim E, Vlček Č, Lang BF, Eliáš M (2015) Bacterial proteins
pinpoint a single eukaryotic root. Proceedings of the National Academy of
Sciences 112: E693–E699. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1420657112
Hampl V, Hug L, Leigh JW, Dacks JB,
Lang BF, Simpson AGB, Roger AJ (2009) Phylogenomic analyses support the
monophyly of Excavata and resolve relationships among eukaryotic “supergroups”.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
106: 3859–3864. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0807880106
Janouškovec J, Tikhonenkov D V,
Mikhailov K V, Simdyanov TG, Aleoshin V V, Mylnikov AP, Keeling PJ (2013)
Colponemids represent multiple ancient alveolate lineages. Current biology 23:
2546–2552. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2013.10.062
Lasek-Nesselquist E, Gogarten JP
(2013) The effects of model choice and mitigating bias on the ribosomal tree of
life. Molecular phylogenetics and evolution 69: 17–38. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2013.05.006
Rodríguez-Ezpeleta N, Brinkmann H,
Burger G, Roger AJ, Gray MW, Philippe H, Lang BF (2007) Toward resolving the
eukaryotic tree: the phylogenetic positions of jakobids and cercozoans. Current
Biology 17: 1420–1425. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2007.07.036
Simpson AGB (2003) Cytoskeletal
organization, phylogenetic affinities and systematics in the contentious taxon
Excavata (Eukaryota). International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary
Microbiology 53: 1759–1777. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.02578-0
Takishita K, Kolisko M, Komatsuzaki
H, Yabuki A, Inagaki Y, Cepicka I, Smejkalová P, Silberman JD, Hashimoto T,
Roger AJ, Simpson AGB (2012) Multigene Phylogenies of Diverse
Carpediemonas-like Organisms Identify the Closest Relatives of ‘Amitochondriate’
Diplomonads and Retortamonads. Protist 163: 344–355. doi: 10.1016/j.protis.2011.12.007
Tikhonenkov DV, Janouškovec J,
Mylnikov AP, Mikhailov KV, Simdyanov TG, Aleoshin VV, Keeling PJ (2014)
Description of Colponema vietnamica sp.n. and Acavomonas peruviana n. gen. n.
sp., Two New Alveolate Phyla (Colponemidia nom. nov. and Acavomonidia nom.
nov.) and Their Contributions to Reconstructing the Ancestral State of
Alveolates and Eukaryotes. PloS one 9: e95467. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0095467
Zhao S,
Shalchian-Tabrizi K, Klaveness D (2013) Sulcozoa revealed as a paraphyletic
group in mitochondrial phylogenomics. Molecular phylogenetics and evolution
69 (3): 462–468. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2013.08.005
